Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content

Social Security Taxation Reform: Policy Analysis and Impact Assessment

Executive Summary

This analysis examines eight policy options for reforming the taxation of Social Security benefits, evaluating their budgetary impacts through 2100 using microsimulation modeling with and without labor supply responses. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) requested this analysis to inform policy discussions around Social Security solvency and tax reform.

Current law subjects Social Security benefits to income taxation under a two-tier system. Benefits become taxable when combined income, defined as the sum of an individual’s adjusted gross income (AGI), nontaxable interest and half of their Social Security benefits, exceeds certain thresholds, with up to 50% of benefits taxable at lower income levels and up to 85% at higher income levels. The revenue generated from this taxation is allocated to the Social Security and Medicare Hospital Insurance trust funds.

Policy Options Analyzed

This study examines eight distinct approaches to reforming Social Security benefit taxation:

Report Structure

This report is organized into five main sections:

  1. Policy Options: Detailed descriptions of the eight reform scenarios analyzed

  2. Methodology: Description of our microsimulation modeling approach using PolicyEngine, including estimates with and without labor supply responses

  3. Revenue Impacts: Quantitative analysis of federal budgetary impacts for each option through 2100

  4. Household Impacts: Distributional analysis showing how reforms affect different income groups and household types

  5. External Estimates: Comparison with prior analysis from CBO, CRFB, and other organizations

Scope and Limitations

This analysis focuses on federal budgetary impacts and household-level distributional effects using 75-year projections (2026-2100). We present estimates both with and without labor supply responses based on CBO elasticities (doubled for workers 65+). The analysis does not evaluate:

Estimates with labor supply responses are typically within 5% of estimates without them for most options. The estimates should be interpreted as projections based on current law baseline assumptions and may vary with changes in economic conditions or policy environment.