Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Regional childcare programmes (planned)

What is modelled today

The current childcare coverage is recorded in policyengine_uk/programs.yaml, where #1703 split the old umbrella entry into per-programme rows after the #1644 audit. Care to Learn and the Scottish funded ELC have no row yet. Coverage works as follows:

Proposed scope by jurisdiction

Scotland: three remaining strands

The #1644 audit flagged three Scottish gaps:

  1. Eligible-two-year-old strand of the funded ELC programme: 2-year-olds who are looked after, under a kinship care order or with an appointed guardian (Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 s. 47(3)), or whose parent receives a qualifying benefit under the Provision of Early Learning and Childcare (Specified Children) (Scotland) Order 2014. It would be modelled the same way as the 3- and 4-year-old strand but gated on those conditions. The qualifying benefits include Universal Credit with earned income of up to £850 an assessment period; Child Tax Credit was removed from the list from 6 April 2025 (SSI 2025/82).

  2. Student Awards Agency Scotland (SAAS) support for student parents: the Childcare Funds that universities and colleges pay out (a Lone Parents’ Childcare Grant of up to £1,215 a year, not income-assessed, plus discretionary help assessed on need), the closest Scottish equivalent of Student Finance England’s Childcare Grant (SAAS childcare fund guidance, 2026 to 2027); and SAAS’s income-assessed Lone Parents’ Grant (up to £1,305). The audit also listed SAAS’s Dependants’ Grant, but that supports adult dependants rather than children.

  3. Support for young parents in further education, the role Care to Learn plays in England. The Education Maintenance Allowance still runs in Scotland for 16- to 19-year-olds, applied for through local councils and colleges, but it is a maintenance payment rather than childcare support, so the childcare side needs its own scoping.

Wales

The audit identified four Welsh programmes:

  1. Childcare Offer for Wales: up to 30 hours a week of combined nursery education (at least 10 hours) and childcare, for up to 48 weeks a year, for 3- and 4-year-olds of working parents or parents in further or higher education (gov.wales). Modelled the same as the English Extended Childcare Entitlement with Welsh-specific income tests and hour caps. Statutory basis: Childcare Funding (Wales) Act 2019.

  2. Flying Start: funded childcare for 2- to 3-year-olds in some of the most disadvantaged areas of Wales (12.5 hours a week, 39 weeks a year), expanded in phases since 2022 with the aim of reaching all 2-year-olds (Welsh Government guidance). Eligibility is geographic, based on lower layer super output areas chosen by each local authority.

  3. Student Finance Wales Childcare Grant, parallel to the English Childcare Grant.

  4. Welsh EMA, parallel to the Scottish EMA.

Northern Ireland

The audit identified four NI programmes:

  1. Pre-school Education Programme (PSEP): a funded place in the immediate pre-school year for every child whose family wants one. In December 2024, 60% of children had 12.5 hours a week and 40% had 22.5 hours; the Department of Education is moving places to 22.5 hours, starting with 77 settings from September 2025 (Department of Education).

  2. Sure Start: younger children in disadvantaged areas, including a programme for 2-year-olds.

  3. Student Finance NI Childcare Grant.

  4. NI EMA.

Implementation outline

For each new programme:

Structural items deferred to this work

The #1644 audit also listed four structural findings. #1703 has since split the programs.yaml umbrella row, and one (a shared in_england helper) is minor; the other two become more pressing once the regional programmes land:

Both belong in a separate cleanup PR rather than mixed into the per-programme work.

Data needs

Several regional programmes (the Scottish two-year-old strand, the Childcare Offer, Flying Start and PSEP) are funded hours rather than cash payments, so their data side is comparatively easy:

The aggregating challenge is choosing whether to expose subsidised hours or subsidised cost as the primary household-level variable. Recommendation: subsidised cost, since that is how the English entitlements already enter household_benefits and gov_spending.

Open questions

References